🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 624+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Rusk shampoo

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(624 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10.2​
$17
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rusk brightening shampoo for blondes, gray, platinum & white hair. Brand recent, not ever used

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Rusk shampoo

Rusk brightening shampoo for blondes, gray, platinum & white hair. Brand recent, not once used

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1014105

Category: Beauty > Hair Care > Shampoos

Original Price: $17 USD

Sale Price: $10.2 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8620 reviews
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
After various use, the Rusk shampoo is uncomplicated to use so no complaints.​
47 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest purchase ever
For the price, the Rusk shampoo is easy to use and it works for me.
27 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous product
For the price, the Rusk shampoo is practical and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
1 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
Honestly, it is uncomplicated to use and it meets expectations.
30 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent product
After certain use, the Rusk shampoo performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.
48 people found this helpful