🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 599+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

“Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot

★★★★★4.7 out of 5(599 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9.5​
$15.83
Sale
✓ no-cost delivery on this item • Limited time offer

Dark, dangerous and sparkly… what’s better than that?Bundle and preserve!

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

“Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot

Dark, dangerous and sparkly… what’s better than that?
Bundle and hold on to!

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 485746

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Jewelry

Original Price: $15.83 USD

Sale Price: $9.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 1100 reviews
MR​
Mike Reynolds ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Columbus, OH
★★★★★
Outstanding quality
Personally, the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot works well enough and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.
35 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Oakland, CA
★★★★☆
delightful “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot
To be fair, it works as described and it’s fine overall.
45 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Seattle, WA
★★★★★
So happy with this
Honestly, it performs as expected and it works for me.
6 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Miami, FL
★★★★★​
supreme decision
I wouldn’t hesitate to request the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot again.
38 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Dallas, TX​
★★★★★
finest purchase ever
At first, the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot feels okay which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful