🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 818+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Mickey Mouse watch

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(818 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Has newer band but will need a battery and face cover does have 2 cracks in it

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Mickey Mouse watch

Has newer band but will need a battery and face cover does have 2 cracks in it

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 439429

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Watches

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8136 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
The Vintage Mickey Mouse watch quality matches its price.
39 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
At first, the Vintage Mickey Mouse watch works fine so no complaints. Works fine so far.
30 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading Vintage Mickey Mouse watch ever
Personally, it fits my needs which feels reasonable.
48 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
No complaints
Personally, the Vintage Mickey Mouse watch works well enough so no complaints.
1 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
8 months ago Β· Detroit, MI

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
marvelous product
After a few days, the Vintage Mickey Mouse watch does its job which is good enough.
49 people found this helpful